Articles

Losing Weight: Fast Way or Slow Way? Decide if tummy tuck is something for you

Losing Weight: Fast Way or Slow Way?

Losing weight is not always easy and it is often tempting to look for fast methods of getting the weight down. Understanding the differences between the fast way and the slow way of losing weight is a key part of determining which methods will work best for any individual.

The Fast Way:

The fast way of losing weight is through a surgical procedure. Depending on the current weight and the goal, the fast way might include extreme weight loss solutions like gastric bypass surgery or it might have cosmetic weight loss surgeries like liposuction or a mini tummy tuck to remove fat from a particular area of the body.

Losing weight through a fast surgical method has a few benefits that make it a tempting solution to weight loss goals, which include:

* Quick weight loss

* Less work in exercise and diet

* Ability to target problem areas

The fast way of shedding extra weight has a few negative aspects to consider which include:

* Potential complications

* Risk of infection

* Scarring

* Sagging skin in cases of extreme weight loss

* Potential odd fat deposits after liposuction

* Expensive

Understanding the potential risks and downsides is often enough to make the slow way more appealing, particularly when it comes to the risk of infection or complications. For most situations, the fast way to lose weight is best reserved as a last solution to the problem.

The Slow Way

The slow way of losing weight is usually the best solution for most individuals because it allows the body to adjust and has fewer potential dangers to consider when trying to shed extra pounds.

Understanding the key benefits of working on weight loss through slow and natural means will help determine if it is the best solution for personal goals. The benefits include:

* Few complications

* Better overall health

* Forming lasting habits that maintain weight loss

* Inexpensive

* No risk of scarring

While the slow way has clear benefits that make it tempting, it is important to also consider the potential downsides, which include:

* Slower results

* More work to see results

* Sagging skin after large weight reductions

* Reaching plateaus

* Potential to lose motivation

The slow way is often the best solution, but it is not for everyone. Weighing the pros and cons of both methods is an important part of getting the most out of a weight loss plan.

The Expense

The expense is a key factor in deciding which solution is best. In general, the fast way is more expensive than the slow way. Cosmetic surgeries such as liposuction and tummy tuck are not covered by insurance companies and an emergency surgery due to obesity will often only have partial coverage.

The expense of the surgical procedure will usually cost several hundred or even thousands of dollars.
The expense of the natural, slow way to lose weight is usually related to gym prices. Foods that are low in calories are not necessarily high in price when careful shopping is considered.

When trying to decide between the fast and slow way of losing weight, it is usually dependent on the situation. The slow way is usually best for long-term and lasting results.

Read more

Found a great new diet program

I’m not one to go ga-ga over the latest diets out there, but a friend of mine told me about the Diet Solution Program and that he had really good results with it. I was impressed enough with what he said about it to go ahead and buy it and do a review for the benefit of my readers here. To make a long story short, this diet program ROCKS! Check out my full diet solution program review here.

Read more

New USDA Plate Icon Is Great Forward Step

The USDA just came out with a new food icon to help people understand the right way to eat. It’s a huge improvement on the old pyramid graphic, and most nutrition experts are rejoicing over this new icon. The improvements are many. For one, it changes from the abstract pyramid, to the more practical plate. The pyramid didn’t really represent serving sizes very well, and it didn’t even show what types of foods the colors represented.

The new plate icon is much more intuitive and easier to understand. It is divided into 4 sections representing the approximate portion size for each food group. Vegetables and fruits have increased in importance and now take up 50% of the plate. Grains take up around another 30%, and the final 20% is protein. It also shows a glass of milk off to the side, however that has drawn criticism from many nutritionists.

While the overall recommendations of food groups on the plate are excellent, the glass of milk off to the side is confusing because it seems to suggest that you should have a glass of milk with every meal. There is currently no evidence to suggest that dairy is needed in a person’s diet, and in fact you could go your entire adult life without eating dairy and be in perfectly good health. I suspect the only reason it was included is because of pressure from the dairy industry and worries about totally eliminating their food group.

Overall this is a fantastic step in the right direction, and one that actually comes as somewhat of a surprise to me. My understanding of the USDA is that there is quite a bit of pressure from lobbyists for the various dairy and meat industries to keep the status quo and ignore much of the evidence that a primarily plant-based diet is far superior to many of the alternatives. The many healthy vegan people who eat no meat proves this. Hopefully in the future they can go all the way and remove the dairy cup too.

Read more